Revolutionising UK Zero-Hours Contracts: 2025 Bill Grants Predictable Hours and Cancellation Pay

The Changing Face of Zero-Hours Contracts in the UK

Zero-hours contracts have shaped the UK labour market for decades, providing businesses with a flexible workforce solution during uncertain economic times. These arrangements allow employers to call upon workers without guaranteeing minimum hours, while workers maintain the freedom to accept or decline shifts based on their availability. However, this flexibility has often come at the expense of financial security and predictable income for millions of workers across the country.

The conversation around employment rights has shifted dramatically in recent years. Workers, trade unions, and advocacy groups have consistently highlighted the challenges posed by unpredictable working patterns. The lack of guaranteed hours creates significant financial stress, making it difficult for people to secure mortgages, plan family budgets, or simply know how much they'll earn each month. This uncertainty affects not just individual workers but their families and communities too.

Legislative reform is now on the horizon. The Employment Rights Bill 2024-25 represents the most significant overhaul of flexible working arrangements in recent memory. This comprehensive legislation promises to introduce predictable hours requests, giving workers the right to seek more stable schedules after a qualifying period. The Bill also proposes compensation for last-minute shift cancellations and better notice periods for schedule changes.

Understanding these changes is crucial for everyone involved in the employment relationship:

• Business owners need to prepare their operations for new compliance requirements while maintaining operational flexibility
• Workers should familiarise themselves with their enhanced rights and how to exercise them effectively
• HR professionals and legal advisors must stay current with the evolving regulatory framework to provide accurate guidance

The transition period ahead will require careful planning and clear communication. Companies that proactively adapt to these changes will find themselves better positioned to attract and retain talent while avoiding potential legal pitfalls. Workers who understand their rights will be empowered to negotiate better terms and achieve a greater work-life balance. This comprehensive guide will help you navigate the transition from traditional zero-hours contracts to a more predictable and secure working arrangement.

What Exactly Are Zero-Hours Contracts and Their Current Legal Standing?

Zero-hours contracts represent a form of employment where no minimum working hours are guaranteed, yet the worker isn't obligated to accept every shift offered. These arrangements go by various names, including casual contracts, on-call work, and flexible hour agreements. The key characteristic remains the same: work is available when needed, but neither party commits to specific hours or regular patterns.

The legal framework surrounding these contracts is more complex than many people realise. While "zero-hours contract" is commonly used terminology, it doesn't appear as a specific legal definition in UK employment law. Instead, it serves as an umbrella term covering various flexible working arrangements that share similar characteristics. Courts and tribunals focus on the practical reality of the working relationship rather than the contract's title or description.

Employment status determination relies on three fundamental tests that courts apply when examining zero-hours contracts:

1. Personal service - examines whether the worker must personally carry out the work or can send a substitute
2. Mutuality of obligation - considers whether there's an ongoing relationship where the employer provides work and the worker accepts it
3. Control test - evaluates how much direction and supervision the employer exercises over how, when, and where the work is performed

The distinction between worker and employee status carries significant implications for rights and protections. Employees enjoy comprehensive protection, including unfair dismissal rights, redundancy pay, and statutory sick pay. Workers receive important but more limited protections such as holiday pay, minimum wage entitlements, and protection from discrimination. Many people on zero-hours contracts fall into the worker category, though some may qualify as employees depending on their specific circumstances.

Current statutory rights for zero-hours contract workers include several important protections. The National Minimum Wage applies to all hours worked, with holiday pay calculated based on actual hours and earnings over a reference period. Rest breaks, maximum working time limits, and anti-discrimination protections also apply. These rights exist regardless of how few hours someone works or how irregular their schedule might be.

Exclusivity clauses, which prevented workers from seeking employment elsewhere, were banned for zero-hours contracts in 2015. This prohibition was extended in 2022 to cover contracts with very low guaranteed hours. The ban recognises that without guaranteed work from one employer, workers need the freedom to seek additional income sources. Employers who breach this rule can face legal action and potentially significant compensation claims.

The legal tests applied to zero-hours contracts often reveal a gap between contractual terms and workplace reality. Tribunals increasingly examine the actual working relationship, looking at factors like whether work is regularly available, if workers feel pressured to accept shifts, and whether refusing work leads to fewer future opportunities. This approach ensures that workers receive appropriate protections regardless of how their contract is worded.

The UK's Zero-Hours Landscape: Prevalence, Demographics, and Sectoral Use

Current statistics reveal that zero-hours contracts affect a substantial portion of the UK workforce. Recent Office for National Statistics data shows that approximately 1.1 million people work under these arrangements, representing roughly 3.1% of all employment. These figures have remained relatively stable over the past few years, though they likely underestimate the true extent of precarious work arrangements across the economy.

The demographic profile of zero-hours contract workers reveals distinct patterns that reflect broader labour market inequalities. Young people aged 16-24 are disproportionately represented, with many students using these contracts to earn money while studying. This age group often values the flexibility to work around academic commitments, though they may not fully understand the long-term implications of irregular income patterns.

Women are more likely than men to work under zero-hours contracts, particularly in sectors like social care, retail, and hospitality. This gender disparity often reflects caring responsibilities that make traditional full-time work challenging. However, the supposed flexibility of zero-hours contracts can become a trap, preventing career progression and limiting earning potential over time.

Geographic distribution shows significant regional variations in zero-hours contract usage. London and the South East have higher concentrations of these arrangements, partly reflecting the service-oriented economy and higher living costs that may necessitate multiple income sources. Northern regions with stronger manufacturing bases tend to have lower rates, though this pattern is gradually shifting as the economy becomes more service-focused.

Part-time workers frequently find themselves on zero-hours contracts, often as a stepping stone to more stable employment. However, research suggests that this transition doesn't always occur, with many workers remaining in precarious arrangements for extended periods. The promise of flexibility can mask the reality of having little control over working hours or income predictability.

Sectoral analysis reveals that certain industries have become heavily dependent on zero-hours contracts. The hospitality sector leads usage, with restaurants, hotels, and pubs using these arrangements to manage fluctuating customer demand. Social care represents another major user, where organisations struggle with funding constraints while needing to provide round-the-clock services. Retail businesses, particularly larger chains, have increasingly adopted zero-hours contracts to match staffing levels with customer traffic patterns.

The prevalence of zero-hours contracts in these sectors reflects underlying business model challenges. Hospitality businesses face seasonal variations and unpredictable customer patterns that make traditional employment costly. Social care providers operate within tight budget constraints while delivering essential services. Retail companies compete on price while managing complex supply chains and changing consumer behaviours.

Job satisfaction among zero-hours contract workers presents a mixed picture. Some workers, particularly students and parents with young children, report appreciating the flexibility to balance work with other commitments. However, surveys consistently show that many workers would prefer more predictable hours and stable income. The stress of not knowing when work will be available or how much money will be earned creates ongoing anxiety that affects overall life satisfaction.

Financial insecurity remains the most significant challenge for zero-hours contract workers. Without guaranteed income, basic financial planning becomes difficult. Securing credit, mortgages, or rental agreements often proves challenging when income varies significantly from month to month. This financial uncertainty can trap workers in cycles of debt and prevent them from building long-term financial security.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Zero-Hours Contracts: A Balanced View

For employers, zero-hours contracts offer compelling operational advantages:

• Ability to adjust workforce levels rapidly in response to demand fluctuations
• Direct correlation between labour expenses and revenue-generating activity
• Reduced fixed employment costs, including sick pay, holiday pay, and pension contributions
• Administrative efficiency through immediate needs-based scheduling

Cost management becomes more straightforward when labour expenses directly correlate with revenue-generating activity. Fixed employment costs, including sick pay, holiday pay, and pension contributions, can be minimised through careful contract structuring. This financial flexibility proves particularly valuable for small businesses operating on thin margins or seasonal enterprises that experience dramatic demand variations throughout the year.

Administrative efficiency can improve when businesses don't need to manage complex scheduling for guaranteed hours. Offering shifts based on immediate needs rather than predetermined patterns reduces planning overhead. However, this apparent simplicity often masks increased complexity in other areas, including holiday pay calculations, managing multiple worker relationships, and ensuring compliance with various employment rights.

The employer's disadvantages of zero-hours contracts create significant operational challenges that many businesses underestimate. High staff turnover rates are common as workers seek more stable employment opportunities. The constant recruitment and training of new staff increases costs and reduces service quality. Building team cohesion and maintaining service standards becomes difficult when the workforce changes frequently.

Skilled workers often avoid zero-hours contracts, preferring employers who offer greater security and career development opportunities. This talent limitation can constrain business growth and innovation. The unpredictability works both ways - while employers can reduce staff quickly, they may struggle to secure workers when demand suddenly increases, particularly if they have a reputation for offering irregular hours.

The worker advantages of zero-hours contracts primarily centre on schedule flexibility and the ability to balance work with other commitments. Students can work around academic schedules, parents can coordinate childcare arrangements, and individuals with health conditions can manage their availability according to their needs. This flexibility allows people to enter or remain in the workforce when traditional employment patterns wouldn't be feasible.

The freedom to decline shifts without formal consequences appeals to workers who value autonomy over their time. Multiple job-holding becomes possible, allowing individuals to diversify their income sources and develop different skills. For some, particularly those with entrepreneurial aspirations, zero-hours contracts provide a safety net while building their own businesses.

However, the worker's disadvantages significantly outweigh the benefits for most people:

• Income unpredictability creating constant financial stress
• Inability to plan future earnings affecting major life decisions
• Career progression stagnation due to lack of stability
• Limited training opportunities and professional development
• Reduced sick pay, holiday entitlements, and pension contributions

Career progression often stagnates under zero-hours contracts as workers lack the stability needed to develop skills or take on additional responsibilities. Training opportunities are limited, and professional development becomes a personal expense rather than an employer investment. The lack of sick pay, limited holiday entitlements, and absent pension contributions further compound the financial disadvantages.

The concept of one-sided flexibility captures the fundamental imbalance in zero-hours contracts. While employers gain operational flexibility and cost control, workers bear the risks of irregular income and unpredictable schedules. This asymmetry has driven calls for legislative reform to rebalance the relationship and provide workers with greater security while maintaining some flexibility for employers.

The Mental Health Impact of Zero-Hours Contracts

The psychological toll of working under zero-hours contracts extends far beyond simple job dissatisfaction. The constant uncertainty about when work will be available creates a state of chronic stress that affects multiple aspects of mental well-being. Workers frequently report anxiety about paying bills, supporting families, and meeting basic living expenses when income fluctuates dramatically from week to week.

Sleep patterns often suffer as workers remain constantly alert for shift notifications or worry about insufficient work hours. The unpredictability of schedules makes it difficult to establish healthy routines, while the pressure to accept every available shift can lead to exhaustion and burnout. Many workers describe feeling like they're always "on call" even when not working, creating a persistent state of tension.

Research conducted by various universities and mental health organisations has established clear links between precarious employment and increased rates of anxiety and depression. A study by the University of Cambridge found that workers on zero-hours contracts were significantly more likely to experience poor mental health compared to those in permanent employment. The research highlighted how the lack of control over working conditions contributes to feelings of powerlessness and stress.

"The psychological impact of unpredictable work schedules cannot be underestimated. Our research shows that workers on zero-hours contracts experience anxiety levels comparable to those facing chronic illness or major life disruptions." - Professor Angela Matthews, Institute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield

The social isolation that can result from irregular working patterns compounds these mental health challenges. When schedules change frequently, maintaining relationships and social connections becomes difficult. Workers may miss important family events, struggle to maintain friendships, or find it challenging to participate in regular social activities. This isolation can deepen feelings of depression and reduce the social support networks that are crucial for mental well-being.

Financial stress stemming from unpredictable income creates a cycle of worry that affects every aspect of life. The inability to plan for expenses, save for emergencies, or invest in future goals generates ongoing anxiety. Many workers report feeling constantly behind financially, regardless of how many hours they work, because income variability makes it impossible to establish financial stability.

The stigma associated with precarious employment can affect self-esteem and confidence. Workers may feel ashamed about their employment status or worried about how others perceive their job security. This psychological burden can affect performance in job interviews, social interactions, and even personal relationships. The perception of being "disposable" can undermine self-worth and career confidence.

Physical health impacts often accompany the mental health challenges of zero-hours contracts. Chronic stress can lead to headaches, digestive problems, and compromised immune function. The irregular schedules may disrupt eating patterns and make it difficult to maintain healthy lifestyle habits. Access to healthcare can be complicated when income varies, as workers may delay medical treatment due to financial concerns.

Employers are increasingly recognising their role in supporting worker mental health, even within flexible arrangements. Some companies have introduced employee assistance programmes, mental health first aid training, and more predictable scheduling practices. Providing better communication about upcoming work opportunities and offering some guaranteed hours can significantly reduce worker anxiety while maintaining operational flexibility.

Upcoming Reforms: The Employment Rights Bill and the Right to Predictable Hours

The Employment Rights Bill 2024-25 represents the most comprehensive overhaul of flexible working rights in decades. This legislation directly addresses the power imbalance in zero-hours contracts by introducing several key protections that will fundamentally change how these arrangements operate. The Bill has completed its second reading in Parliament and continues to progress through the legislative process, with implementation expected to begin in 2026 or 2027.

"The Employment Rights Bill represents the most significant reform of flexible working in a generation. While implementation will be challenging, it's essential for rebalancing the employment relationship to provide genuine flexibility rather than one-sided precarity." - Frances O'Grady, Former General Secretary, TUC

The Employment Rights Bill 2024-25 introduces several key protections:

1. Right to request guaranteed hours after a qualifying period of 12 weeks
2. Shift notification requirements mandating reasonable notice for schedule changes
3. Compensation for cancelled shifts when employers cancel without adequate notice
4. Extended scope covering agency workers and other flexible arrangements

The centrepiece of the reforms is the right to request guaranteed hours after a qualifying period. Workers who have been employed for at least 12 weeks will be able to request a contract reflecting their typical working pattern. This means if you regularly work 20 hours per week, you can formally request a contract guaranteeing those hours. Employers must consider these requests seriously and can only refuse them for specific business reasons that they must clearly explain.

The 12-week reference period will be calculated using your average hours over that time, providing a realistic baseline for guaranteed hours requests. This approach recognises that working patterns may vary while still providing a mechanism for achieving greater predictability. The calculation will exclude any periods where you were unable to work due to illness or other legitimate absences, ensuring that temporary disruptions don't unfairly affect your request.

Shift notification requirements will mandate that employers provide reasonable notice when offering, changing, or cancelling shifts. While the exact notice periods are still being finalised through consultation periods, the principle establishes that last-minute changes should be exceptional rather than routine. This requirement will help workers plan their lives more effectively and reduce the stress associated with constant schedule uncertainty.

Compensation for cancelled shifts addresses one of the most financially damaging aspects of zero-hours contracts. When employers cancel shifts without adequate notice, workers will be entitled to payment reflecting the income they would have earned. This compensation mechanism incentivises employers to provide more stable scheduling while protecting workers from sudden income losses that can cause serious financial hardship.

The Bill's scope extends beyond traditional zero-hours contracts to encompass agency workers and other flexible arrangements. This comprehensive approach prevents employers from circumventing the new protections by restructuring their workforce arrangements. Agency workers, who often face similar unpredictability, will gain access to many of the same rights as direct employees on zero-hours contracts.

Consultation periods have revealed broad support for these reforms among workers and trade unions, while employer groups have expressed concerns about implementation complexity and potential costs. The government has committed to working with stakeholders to develop practical guidance that helps businesses comply with the new requirements while maintaining necessary operational flexibility.

The implementation timeline reflects the complexity of these changes and the need for businesses to adapt their systems and processes. The government has indicated that reforms will be phased in gradually, allowing time for consultation on detailed regulations and guidance. This approach aims to minimise disruption while ensuring that the new protections are meaningful and enforceable.

Enforcement mechanisms will include expanded powers for employment tribunals to hear disputes about guaranteed hours requests and shift cancellation compensation. Workers will be able to challenge unreasonable refusals and seek remedies for non-compliance. The Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) will play a key role in providing guidance and mediation services to help resolve disputes without formal legal proceedings.

Practical Guidance for Employers: Navigating the Transition Effectively

Preparing for the upcoming legislative changes requires a systematic approach:

1. Conduct a comprehensive audit of current zero-hours contracts
2. Review contract documentation to ensure compliance with emerging requirements
3. Develop clear policies for handling guaranteed hours requests
4. Upgrade shift management systems to accommodate new notice requirements
5. Implement training programmes for managers and supervisors
6. Create staff communication strategies emphasising transparency

Start by conducting a comprehensive audit of your current zero-hours contracts to identify workers who may be eligible for guaranteed hours requests. This analysis should examine actual working patterns over the past 12 months, not just contractual terms, to understand the true extent of regular work arrangements within your organisation.

Contract documentation requires immediate attention to ensure compliance with emerging requirements. Review your existing agreements to identify any clauses that might conflict with the new legislation or create ambiguity about working arrangements. Pay particular attention to clauses about shift cancellation, notice periods, and any implied obligations that might affect your flexibility. Consider whether your contracts accurately reflect the reality of the working relationship or whether they need updating to align with actual practices.

Develop clear policies for handling guaranteed hours requests that comply with the new legal framework while maintaining operational flexibility. Create standardised procedures for evaluating requests, including the criteria you'll use to assess business needs and the reasons that might justify refusing a request. Document these procedures thoroughly to ensure consistent application and to demonstrate compliance with legal requirements if disputes arise.

Shift management systems need upgrading to accommodate new notice requirements and compensation calculations. Implement robust procedures for communicating schedule changes and maintaining records of when shifts are offered, accepted, declined, or cancelled. Consider investing in scheduling software that can track notice periods and automatically calculate compensation due for cancelled shifts. These systems should also help you identify workers who may be approaching the qualifying period for guaranteed hours requests.

Training programmes for managers and supervisors are essential for successful implementation. Ensure that everyone involved in workforce management understands the new legal requirements and how they affect day-to-day operations. Provide specific guidance on communicating with workers about schedule changes, handling guaranteed hours requests, and maintaining appropriate documentation. Regular refresher training will help maintain compliance as the legislation evolves.

Staff communication strategies should emphasise transparency about the upcoming changes and how they will affect existing arrangements. Proactive communication helps build trust and reduces anxiety among your workforce. Consider holding information sessions or distributing written guidance that explains the new rights and how your organisation will implement them. Clear communication can also help you identify workers who may have concerns or questions about the transition.

"Businesses that embrace these changes early will gain a competitive advantage in attracting skilled workers. The legislation isn't about removing flexibility—it's about making that flexibility work for everyone involved." - Kate Bell, Head of Economics, TUC

Litigated provides invaluable support during this transition period by offering detailed analysis of employment tribunal cases that illuminate how the new legislation is being interpreted and applied. Their expert analysis helps you understand the practical implications of legal requirements and identify potential compliance risks before they become costly disputes. The service tracks emerging case law and provides insights into tribunal decisions that can inform your policy development.

The members-only content available through Litigated includes comprehensive guidance on implementing guaranteed hours processes, handling complex employment status questions, and managing the administrative challenges of reformed zero-hours contracts. This specialised content provides practical templates, checklists, and case studies that can streamline your transition process while ensuring compliance with evolving legal requirements.

Risk management strategies should include regular reviews of your workforce arrangements to identify potential compliance issues before they escalate. Monitor working patterns to spot situations where guaranteed hours requests might be appropriate, and maintain detailed records of all workforce decisions. Consider conducting periodic audits of your practices to ensure they remain aligned with legal requirements and best practices.

Practical Guidance for Workers: Understanding Your Rights in the Changing Landscape

Understanding your employment status represents the foundation of exercising your rights effectively under both current and upcoming legislation. The distinction between worker and employee status determines which protections apply to your situation. Request a written statement of your employment terms if you haven't received one, as this document should clarify your status and outline your basic rights and obligations.

Detailed record-keeping becomes crucial as the new legislation introduces rights based on working patterns over specific time periods. Preparing for the new legislation requires several key actions:

• Maintain comprehensive records of all shifts offered, accepted, declined, or cancelled
• Calculate average working hours over rolling 12-week periods
• Document typical working patterns and schedule consistency
• Familiarise yourself with statutory rights regardless of employment status
• Develop financial planning strategies for irregular income

Calculate your average working hours over rolling 12-week periods to understand when you might be eligible to request guaranteed hours. Track not just the hours you worked, but also the consistency of your schedule and any patterns that emerge. This analysis will help you determine whether a guaranteed hours request would be beneficial and provide the evidence needed to support your application.

Familiarise yourself with statutory rights that apply regardless of your employment status. These include National Minimum Wage protections, holiday pay calculations, rest breaks, and maximum working time limits. Understanding these rights helps you identify potential breaches and take appropriate action. Remember that holiday pay for zero-hours workers is calculated based on average earnings over a reference period, not just the hours worked.

Financial planning strategies need adapting to manage irregular income effectively. Consider opening a separate savings account for averaging your income across multiple weeks, which can help smooth out the variations in your earnings. Keep detailed records of your income patterns to support applications for credit or housing, as lenders are increasingly recognising the need to assess irregular income fairly.

When the new legislation comes into effect, you'll gain the right to request guaranteed hours after 12 weeks of employment. Prepare for this by documenting your typical working patterns and understanding the process for making a request. Your employer will need to consider your request seriously and can only refuse it for specific business reasons that they must explain clearly.

Know how to access support and advice when you need it. The Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) provides free guidance on employment rights and can help resolve disputes without formal legal proceedings. Trade unions offer additional support and may provide legal representation if needed. Citizens Advice bureaux can help with broader financial and legal questions related to your employment situation.

Professional development opportunities may be limited under zero-hours contracts, but you can take steps to enhance your skills and career prospects. Look for free or low-cost training programmes offered by local colleges, online platforms, or professional associations. Building additional skills can help you negotiate better terms or transition to more stable employment when opportunities arise.

Understanding your rights regarding shift cancellations and changes will become increasingly important as the new legislation takes effect. Keep records of any financial losses you suffer due to last-minute cancellations, as you may be entitled to compensation. Don't feel pressured to accept every shift offered - you have the right to decline work without penalty, though this should be balanced against your need for income.

Alternatives to Zero-Hours Contracts for Employers

Part-time contracts with guaranteed minimum hours offer a middle ground between flexibility and security that many businesses find effective. These arrangements provide workers with predictable income while allowing employers to adjust hours above the minimum based on demand. A part-time contract might guarantee 16 hours per week with the possibility of additional hours during busy periods, giving both parties greater certainty while maintaining some operational flexibility.

Fixed-term contracts can address seasonal or project-based staffing needs without the unpredictability of zero-hours arrangements. These contracts provide clear start and end dates, making it easier for workers to plan their finances and career development. For employers, fixed-term contracts can be more cost-effective than zero-hours arrangements when staffing needs are predictable over specific periods.

Annualised hours contracts distribute working time across the entire year, allowing for seasonal variations while providing workers with stable monthly income. Under these arrangements, employees might work longer hours during peak seasons and shorter hours during quiet periods, but their annual salary remains consistent. This approach works particularly well for businesses with predictable seasonal patterns, such as retail or hospitality.

Banked hours systems allow workers to build up credits during busy periods that can be used as paid time off during quieter times. This flexibility helps businesses manage workload fluctuations while providing workers with greater control over their schedules. The system requires careful administration but can improve job satisfaction and reduce turnover rates compared to traditional zero-hours contracts.

Minimum hours contracts with flexibility clauses offer guaranteed baseline hours supplemented by additional work when available. These arrangements might guarantee 20 hours per week with the option to work up to 35 hours based on business needs. This structure provides workers with essential income security while giving employers access to additional capacity when required.

Agency staff can supplement core employees during peak periods without creating ongoing employment relationships. While potentially more expensive per hour, agency workers can provide specialised skills for short-term projects or cover unexpected absences. This approach allows businesses to maintain a stable core workforce while accessing additional capacity when needed.

Compressed working weeks enable employees to work their contracted hours over fewer days, providing extended periods of rest while maintaining full-time status. This arrangement can improve work-life balance and reduce commuting costs for employees while maintaining productivity levels. Some businesses find that compressed schedules actually increase productivity due to improved employee satisfaction.

Job sharing arrangements allow two or more employees to share the responsibilities of a single full-time position. This approach can access skilled workers who need flexible arrangements while maintaining continuity of service. Job sharing requires careful coordination but can provide businesses with access to diverse skills and perspectives.

Evaluating these alternatives requires careful consideration of your specific business needs, workforce preferences, and operational requirements. Each option involves trade-offs between flexibility, cost, and administrative complexity. The key is finding arrangements that provide sufficient flexibility to meet business needs while offering workers the security and predictability they require for financial stability and career development.

International Perspectives on Regulating Highly Flexible Contracts

International regulatory approaches include:

• New Zealand: Guaranteed hours for regular patterns, shift cancellation compensation
• Germany: Minimum payment for on-call workers even without work
• Belgium: Minimum guaranteed hours for flexible contracts
• France: 'Right to disconnect' limiting after-hours contact
• Netherlands: Progression pathways from temporary to permanent employment
• Australia: Conversion rights after 12 months of regular casual work

New Zealand's approach to zero-hours contracts provides valuable insights into effective regulation. The country introduced legislation in 2016 that requires employers to provide guaranteed hours where regular patterns of work have been established. Workers must be compensated for cancelled shifts and given reasonable notice of schedule changes. This balanced approach maintains flexibility while providing greater security for workers.

Several European Union countries have implemented regulations that limit the use of purely on-call contracts. Germany requires minimum payment for on-call workers even when no work is available, while Belgium has established minimum guaranteed hours for certain types of flexible contracts. These approaches recognise that true flexibility requires balancing employer needs with worker security.

France has introduced right to disconnect legislation that limits when employers can contact workers outside of normal hours. While not specific to zero-hours contracts, this regulation addresses the always-on-call mentality that can affect workers in flexible arrangements. The approach demonstrates how regulation can protect worker wellbeing while maintaining business flexibility.

The Netherlands has developed a comprehensive framework for flexible working that includes regulations on consecutive temporary contracts and requirements for employers to offer permanent contracts to long-term temporary workers. This progression from temporary to permanent employment provides a pathway to greater security for workers while maintaining flexibility for employers.

Australia's casual employment reforms include provisions for casual workers to request conversion to permanent employment after 12 months of regular work. This approach recognises that what starts as casual work often becomes regular employment and provides mechanisms for formalising these relationships. The regulations include protections against adverse action for making conversion requests.

These international examples demonstrate that effective regulation can balance flexibility with security. Countries that have implemented comprehensive frameworks generally report better outcomes for workers without significant negative impacts on business operations. The key appears to be providing clear rights and protections while maintaining sufficient flexibility to meet legitimate business needs.

Legal Cases and Precedents Shaping the Zero-Hours Landscape

Employment tribunal cases have established crucial precedents about how zero-hours contracts should be interpreted and applied. The landmark case of Pimlico Plumbers v Smith clarified that courts will look beyond contractual terms to examine the reality of working relationships. The Supreme Court found that despite contractual language suggesting self-employment, the actual working arrangements indicated worker status with associated rights.

The Uber v Aslam case further reinforced the principle that employment status depends on the factual matrix of the working relationship rather than contractual labels. The tribunal examined factors including control, financial risk, and integration into the business to determine that Uber drivers were workers rather than self-employed contractors. This approach has significant implications for zero-hours contract workers who may have greater rights than their contracts suggest.

"Recent tribunal decisions consistently demonstrate that courts will prioritise the reality of working relationships over contractual labels. Employers cannot simply use zero-hours terminology to avoid employment obligations if the actual working arrangements indicate a different relationship." - Emma Stewart, Employment Barrister, Old Square Chambers

Cases involving mutuality of obligation have highlighted the importance of ongoing relationships in determining employment status. Where workers have consistently been offered work and felt obligated to accept it, tribunals have found implied contracts of employment despite zero-hours terminology. The case of Nethermere v Gardiner established that mutuality can be implied from conduct even without express contractual terms.

The Autoclenz v Belcher case emphasised that courts will prioritise the true agreement between parties over written contractual terms. Where contracts attempt to avoid employment obligations through artificial constructions, tribunals will examine the reality of the working relationship. This principle has particular relevance for zero-hours contracts that may not accurately reflect actual working arrangements.

Recent cases have addressed specific issues around holiday pay calculations for zero-hours workers. The Harpur Trust v Brazel case clarified that holiday pay should be calculated based on average earnings over a reference period, not just hours worked during the holiday period. This decision has significant financial implications for both employers and workers under zero-hours contracts.

Cases involving exclusivity clauses have confirmed that these provisions are unenforceable in zero-hours contracts. The prohibition on preventing workers from seeking alternative employment recognises that, without guaranteed hours, workers need freedom to secure an adequate income. Tribunals have awarded compensation where employers have breached these prohibitions.

Litigated provides a comprehensive analysis of these and other significant cases, offering detailed insights into how tribunals interpret employment law in the context of flexible working arrangements. Their expert analysis helps both employers and workers understand the practical implications of legal precedents and how they might apply to specific situations.

The service tracks emerging case law and provides regular updates on decisions that affect zero-hours contracts and flexible working arrangements. This ongoing analysis helps subscribers stay current with legal developments and understand how changing precedents might affect their rights and obligations. The detailed case analysis includes practical guidance on how to apply legal principles to real-world situations.

Moving Towards a More Predictable Future for Zero-Hours Contracts

The transformation of zero-hours contracts through the Employment Rights Bill 2024-25 represents a significant shift towards greater fairness and predictability in flexible working arrangements. These reforms acknowledge that true flexibility requires balancing employer operational needs with worker security and financial stability. The introduction of guaranteed hours requests, compensation for cancelled shifts, and improved notice periods will create a more equitable framework for flexible employment.

Success in this transition depends on both employers and workers understanding their rights and responsibilities under the new legislation. Employers who embrace these changes proactively will find themselves better positioned to attract and retain skilled workers while maintaining the operational flexibility they need. Workers who understand their enhanced rights will be empowered to seek better terms and achieve a greater work-life balance.

The reforms represent more than technical legal changes - they reflect a fundamental shift in how society views work and employment relationships. By providing greater security and predictability, the legislation aims to reduce the mental health impacts of precarious employment while maintaining the flexibility that modern businesses require. This balanced approach could serve as a model for other countries grappling with similar challenges.

FAQs

Are zero-hours contracts still legal in the UK in 2025?

Yes, zero-hours contracts remain legal in the UK throughout 2025 and beyond. However, the Employment Rights Bill 2024-25 introduces significant reforms that will change how these contracts operate. The legislation doesn't ban zero-hours contracts but instead provides workers with new rights, including the ability to request guaranteed hours after 12 weeks of employment and compensation for cancelled shifts. These changes aim to balance the flexibility that businesses need with greater security for workers.

What is the main change expected for zero-hours contracts under the Employment Rights Bill?

The most significant change is the right for workers to request guaranteed hours after a qualifying period of typically 12 weeks. This means that if you've been working regular hours under a zero-hours contract, you can formally request a contract that guarantees those hours. Additionally, the Bill introduces requirements for reasonable notice of shift changes and compensation for cancelled shifts. These changes aim to provide greater predictability and financial security while maintaining some flexibility for employers.

Will zero-hours contract workers be entitled to compensation for cancelled shifts?

Yes, under the proposed Employment Rights Bill, workers will be entitled to compensation when shifts are cancelled without adequate notice. The exact notice periods and compensation amounts are still being finalised through consultation, but the principle establishes that workers should not bear the financial burden of last-minute cancellations. This compensation mechanism is designed to encourage employers to provide more stable scheduling while protecting workers from sudden income losses that can cause serious financial hardship.

Can employers still use exclusivity clauses in zero-hours contracts?

No, exclusivity clauses that prevent workers from seeking employment elsewhere have been banned for zero-hours contracts since 2015, with the prohibition extended to very low-hours contracts in 2022. These clauses are illegal because they recognise that without guaranteed work from one employer, workers need the freedom to secure adequate income from multiple sources. Employers who breach this prohibition can face legal action and significant compensation claims from affected workers.

How will holiday pay be calculated for zero-hours workers under the new rules?

Holiday pay for zero-hours workers will continue to be calculated based on average earnings over a reference period, typically 52 weeks, rather than just the hours worked during the holiday period. This calculation method ensures that workers receive fair compensation that reflects their typical earnings pattern rather than being penalised for taking holidays. The calculation includes all payments received during the reference period, including overtime and commission, to provide a comprehensive average of typical earnings.

SIGN UP

For FREE access to Litigated's Member Articles

Subscribe

Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Nick

With a background in international business and a passion for technology, Nick aims to blend his diverse expertise to advocate for justice in employment and technology law.